Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs HiPeople
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
Greenhouse leads HiPeople by 6 points.
Greenhouse scores 67 and HiPeople 61 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Greenhouse: Greenhouse is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and HiPeople on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Greenhouse 78, HiPeople 62) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse5
- HiPeople2
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation78 vs 62
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HiPeople under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only HiPeople is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | HiPeople |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight50% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78HiPeople623.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight67% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42HiPeople351.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight81% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64HiPeople580.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66HiPeople620.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight94% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86HiPeople840.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58HiPeople600.2 weighted points to HiPeople
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64HiPeople660.2 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +5.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus HiPeople, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | HiPeople | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 62 | +16 | +3.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 84 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 35 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 58 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 62 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 66 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 61D | +6 | +5.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | HiPeople | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and HiPeople sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.