§ The result
Greenhouse leads HirePro on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and HirePro (Screening) are 29 points apart under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) for Greenhouse against 38 (F) for HirePro. HirePro leads none of the 7 criteria, and Greenhouse is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (Greenhouse 86, HirePro 33) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Greenhouse 78, HirePro 30), the second being 33% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
§ The record
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HirePro is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Greenhouse | HirePro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Greenhouse 78 · HirePro 30
9.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Greenhouse 86 · HirePro 33
9.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Greenhouse 58 · HirePro 35
2.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Greenhouse 42 · HirePro 25
2.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Greenhouse 64 · HirePro 50
2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Greenhouse 66 · HirePro 55
1.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Greenhouse 64 · HirePro 52
1.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +28.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 28.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +29 beside that +28.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus HirePro.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | HirePro | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 30 | +48 | +9.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 33 | +53 | +9.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 50 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 55 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 35 | +23 | +2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 52 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 38 (F) | +29 | +28.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | HirePro | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next