Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs HireQuotient
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Greenhouse leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and HireQuotient (Sourcing) are 33 points apart under rubric v1.0, 67 (D) for Greenhouse against 34 (F) for HireQuotient. HireQuotient leads none of the 7 criteria, and Greenhouse is ahead on 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage Greenhouse holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Greenhouse 86, HireQuotient 18, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points Greenhouse gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- HireQuotient0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 18
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only HireQuotient is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight37% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86HireQuotient1812.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight63% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78HireQuotient358.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight74% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64HireQuotient403.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight84% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58HireQuotient303.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight93% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42HireQuotient223.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64HireQuotient501.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66HireQuotient571.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +33.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 33.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +33 beside that +33.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus HireQuotient, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 35 | +43 | +8.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 18 | +68 | +12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 22 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 40 | +24 | +3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 57 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 30 | +28 | +3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 50 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 34F | +33 | +33.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.