Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Indeed
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Indeed
Job marketplace whose employer-side AI (the Talent Scout agent, Sourcing Assistant, Smart Screening and candidate matching) sources, ranks and scores candidates from Indeed's profile pool and applicant flow and drafts outreach to them.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Greenhouse leads Indeed on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) opens a 17-point lead on Indeed (Sourcing), 67 (D) to 50 (F). Indeed is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Greenhouse takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Human Oversight Design, Greenhouse 66 to Indeed 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 86, Indeed 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse6
- Indeed0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Indeed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Indeed |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight52% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Indeed388.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight76% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Indeed584.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight89% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Indeed402.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight94% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Indeed580.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Indeed380.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Indeed630.4 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +16.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +16.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Indeed, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Indeed | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 58 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 38 | +48 | +8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 58 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 63 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 64 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 50F | +17 | +16.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Indeed | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 2 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 36 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Indeed has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Indeed sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 40 for Indeed, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Indeed last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.