Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs LinkedIn Recruiter
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Greenhouse leads LinkedIn Recruiter by 10 points.
Greenhouse sits 10 points above LinkedIn Recruiter under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 57 (F) — with Greenhouse filed under ATS-integrated and LinkedIn Recruiter under Sourcing. Greenhouse leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while LinkedIn Recruiter leads 1, including Customer Documentation, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Greenhouse 86, LinkedIn Recruiter 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 61% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse5
- LinkedIn Recruiter1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 50
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2002 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86LinkedIn Recruiter506.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78LinkedIn Recruiter672.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight89% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58LinkedIn Recruiter501.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight94% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42LinkedIn Recruiter380.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64LinkedIn Recruiter680.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64LinkedIn Recruiter620.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +10.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +10.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus LinkedIn Recruiter, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 67 | +11 | +2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 50 | +36 | +6.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 62 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 66 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 68 | -4 | -0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 57F | +10 | +10.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.