HomeCompareGreenhouse vs Mercer | Mettl

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Greenhouse vs Mercer | Mettl

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Greenhouse leads Mercer | Mettl on all 7 criteria.

Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) and Mercer | Mettl (Assessment): 67 (D) for Greenhouse, 42 (F) for Mercer | Mettl. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Mercer | Mettl leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (Greenhouse 86, Mercer | Mettl 42) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Greenhouse 78, Mercer | Mettl 38), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Greenhouse is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Mercer | Mettl under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Mercer | Mettl is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordGreenhouseMercer | Mettl
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20122010

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Greenhouse 78 · Mercer | Mettl 38

    8.0 weighted points to Greenhouse

  2. 18% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Greenhouse 86 · Mercer | Mettl 42

    7.9 weighted points to Greenhouse

  3. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Greenhouse 66 · Mercer | Mettl 45

    2.5 weighted points to Greenhouse

  4. 12% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Greenhouse 58 · Mercer | Mettl 38

    2.4 weighted points to Greenhouse

  5. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Greenhouse 42 · Mercer | Mettl 28

    2.1 weighted points to Greenhouse

  6. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Greenhouse 64 · Mercer | Mettl 55

    1.3 weighted points to Greenhouse

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Greenhouse 64 · Mercer | Mettl 52

    1.0 weighted points to Greenhouse

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +25.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +25 beside that +25.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Greenhouse minus Mercer | Mettl.

CategoryWeightGreenhouseMercer | MettlΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7838+40+8.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%8642+44+7.9
FRIA Support15%4228+14+2.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%6455+9+1.3
Human Oversight Design12%6645+21+2.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%5838+20+2.4
Customer Documentation8%6452+12+1.0
Total100%67 (D)42 (F)+25+25.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightGreenhouseMercer | Mettl
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain01
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%161Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain95Sources on the vendor's own domain

Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Mercer | Mettl has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Mercer | Mettl, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Greenhouse last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Mercer | Mettl last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.