Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Paradox
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
67
DConcerning
Vendor profile
Paradox
Conversational AI ("Olivia") that screens, schedules, and engages candidates over chat and SMS, often deployed on top of an existing ATS.
41
FSubstantial gaps
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Paradox.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Paradox | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 40 | +38 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 50 | +36 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 45 | +19 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 50 | +16 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 35 | +23 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 45 | +19 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 41 (F) | +26 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
Paradox
10 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 5
- absence
- 2
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 2