Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Recruit CRM
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Concerning
ATS-integrated
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Greenhouse leads Recruit CRM on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse scores 67 (D) to 40 (F) for Recruit CRM, a 27-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. Of the 7 criteria Recruit CRM wins none, and the narrowest lead Greenhouse holds is on Customer Documentation, Greenhouse 64 to Recruit CRM 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Greenhouse 86, Recruit CRM 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Greenhouse7
- Recruit CRM0
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency86 vs 20
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Greenhouse and Recruit CRM are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of
Only Greenhouse is in scope of
| Record | Greenhouse | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | Not recorded |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight45% of the movement so far
Greenhouse86Recruit CRM2011.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
Greenhouse78Recruit CRM348.8 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight85% of the movement so far
Greenhouse58Recruit CRM421.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Recruit CRM541.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
Greenhouse42Recruit CRM341.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight99% of the movement so far
Greenhouse66Recruit CRM581.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Greenhouse64Recruit CRM600.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +26.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +26.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Recruit CRM, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 34 | +44 | +8.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 20 | +66 | +11.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 34 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 54 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 58 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 60 | +4 | +0.3 |
| Total | 100% | 67D | 40F | +27 | +26.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Greenhouse | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse and Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.