Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Teamtailor
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Teamtailor
Teamtailor is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking and employer-branding platform whose OpenAI-powered "Co-pilot" assists recruiters with candidate screening, resume and interview summaries, talent-pool matching, interview-question generation, and AI-assisted job-ad and content writing.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Teamtailor.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Teamtailor | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 50 | +28 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 30 | +56 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 42 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 58 | +6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 54 | +12 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 42 | +16 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 62 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 47 (F) | +20 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
Teamtailor
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 13
- absence
- 6
- audit report
- 1