Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Greenhouse vs Thomas International
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Greenhouse minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | Greenhouse | Thomas International | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 78 | 54 | +24 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 86 | 43 | +43 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 33 | +9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 57 | +7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 51 | +15 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 40 | +18 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 60 | +4 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 48 (F) | +19 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1
Evidence count
Thomas International
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6