Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs HireQuotient
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
hackajob leads HireQuotient by 11 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the Sourcing entries hackajob and HireQuotient at 45 and 34, a gap of 11 points. HireQuotient takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Human Oversight Design among them, against 6 for hackajob, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hackajob 60, HireQuotient 35 — and at a 20% weight it carries 44% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob6
- HireQuotient1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation60 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob and HireQuotient are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only HireQuotient is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | SG |
| Founded | 2014 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight43% of the movement so far
hackajob60HireQuotient355.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight67% of the movement so far
hackajob58HireQuotient402.7 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight80% of the movement so far
hackajob32HireQuotient221.5 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
hackajob38HireQuotient301.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
hackajob60HireQuotient500.8 weighted points to hackajob
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight98% of the movement so far
hackajob20HireQuotient180.4 weighted points to hackajob
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob55HireQuotient570.2 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus HireQuotient, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 22 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 57 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 34F | +11 | +11.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.