HomeComparehackajob vs Jobylon

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

hackajob vs Jobylon

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Jobylon and hackajob.

Jobylon holds a 3-point edge over hackajob under rubric v1.0, 48 to 45, across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 1 in favour of Jobylon, with 2 level: Jobylon is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and hackajob on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hackajob 20, Jobylon 28 — and at an 18% weight it carries 41% of the weighted advantage Jobylon holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordhackajobJobylon
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersGBSE
Founded20142011

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 32% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    hackajob 20 · Jobylon 28

    1.4 weighted points to Jobylon

  2. 20% weight · 54% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    hackajob 60 · Jobylon 55

    1.0 weighted points to hackajob

  3. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    hackajob 38 · Jobylon 45

    0.8 weighted points to Jobylon

  4. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    hackajob 32 · Jobylon 36

    0.6 weighted points to Jobylon

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    hackajob 55 · Jobylon 60

    0.6 weighted points to Jobylon

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -2.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hackajob minus Jobylon.

CategoryWeighthackajobJobylonΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6055+5+1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2028-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%3236-4-0.6
Data Governance Disclosure15%5858--
Human Oversight Design12%5560-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3845-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%6060--
Total100%45 (F)48 (F)-3-2.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthackajobJobylon
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%50Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%80Sources on the vendor's own domain50Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%384Sources on the vendor's own domain285Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 75 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
hackajob last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobylon last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.