Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs Loxo
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Loxo
Loxo is an AI-native talent-intelligence platform that combines candidate sourcing, a recruiting CRM, and an applicant tracking system, using proprietary ranking models and a self-built talent graph of 800M+ people to source, rank, and match candidates for recruiting and staffing firms.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
hackajob leads Loxo by 8 points.
hackajob scores 45 and Loxo 37 under rubric v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of hackajob, with 1 level: hackajob is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Loxo on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (hackajob 60, Loxo 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 73% of the weighted advantage hackajob holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob5
- Loxo1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation60 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob and Loxo are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only hackajob is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight71% of the movement so far
hackajob60Loxo306.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight85% of the movement so far
hackajob58Loxo501.2 weighted points to hackajob
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight92% of the movement so far
hackajob55Loxo500.6 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
hackajob32Loxo300.3 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight98% of the movement so far
hackajob38Loxo400.2 weighted points to Loxo
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob60Loxo580.2 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.0.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus Loxo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | Loxo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 20 | - | - |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 30 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 37F | +8 | +8.0 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | Loxo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Loxo last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against