Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs Oracle Recruiting
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
Oracle Recruiting
Oracle Recruiting (part of Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, formerly Oracle Recruiting Cloud) is an enterprise applicant tracking system whose embedded AI suggests and ranks candidates, finds similar candidates, and generates 0-5 generative-AI match ratings against job requisitions to assist recruiters.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Oracle Recruiting leads hackajob on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Oracle Recruiting holds a 4-point edge over hackajob under rubric v1.0, 49 to 45, across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. hackajob is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Oracle Recruiting takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Data Governance Disclosure, hackajob 58 to Oracle Recruiting 60. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hackajob 20, Oracle Recruiting 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob0
- Oracle Recruiting6
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency20 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | hackajob | Oracle Recruiting |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 1977 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight51% of the movement so far
hackajob20Oracle Recruiting301.8 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 2
Human Oversight Design
12% weight68% of the movement so far
hackajob55Oracle Recruiting600.6 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight80% of the movement so far
hackajob32Oracle Recruiting350.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight89% of the movement so far
hackajob58Oracle Recruiting600.3 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight95% of the movement so far
hackajob38Oracle Recruiting400.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob60Oracle Recruiting620.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -3.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -4 beside that -3.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus Oracle Recruiting, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | Oracle Recruiting | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 30 | -10 | -1.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 62 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 49F | -4 | -3.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | Oracle Recruiting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.