HomeComparehackajob vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

hackajob vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

hackajob leads SeekOut by 11 points.

Rubric v1.0 scores the Sourcing entries hackajob and SeekOut at 45 and 34, a gap of 11 points. SeekOut takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for hackajob, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (hackajob 60, SeekOut 35, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage hackajob builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

hackajob and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only hackajob is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordhackajobSeekOut
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersGBUS
Founded20142017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 28% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    hackajob 60 · SeekOut 35

    5.0 weighted points to hackajob

  2. 18% weight · 48% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    hackajob 20 · SeekOut 40

    3.6 weighted points to SeekOut

  3. 15% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    hackajob 58 · SeekOut 35

    3.4 weighted points to hackajob

  4. 8% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    hackajob 60 · SeekOut 35

    2.0 weighted points to hackajob

  5. 12% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    hackajob 38 · SeekOut 25

    1.6 weighted points to hackajob

  6. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    hackajob 55 · SeekOut 45

    1.2 weighted points to hackajob

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    hackajob 32 · SeekOut 25

    1.1 weighted points to hackajob

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hackajob minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeighthackajobSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6035+25+5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2040-20-3.6
FRIA Support15%3225+7+1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5835+23+3.4
Human Oversight Design12%5545+10+1.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3825+13+1.6
Customer Documentation8%6035+25+2.0
Total100%45 (F)34 (F)+11+10.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthackajobSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%50Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%80Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain01—
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%384Sources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
hackajob last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.