Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
hackajob vs SeekOut
hackajob
Archer, hackajob's AI sourcing agent, is calibrated by a recruiter on a hiring brief, then finds, engages and qualifies passive candidates from a 1.5m-member pool and 800m+ indexed profiles and invites those who meet the bar to apply through the employer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
SeekOut
Sourcing platform aggregating public profile data into a searchable talent index, with AI-assisted candidate matching and outreach.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
hackajob leads SeekOut by 11 points.
Rubric v1.0 scores the Sourcing entries hackajob and SeekOut at 45 and 34, a gap of 11 points. SeekOut takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for hackajob, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (hackajob 60, SeekOut 35, 20% weight), is only 35% of the weighted advantage hackajob builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- hackajob6
- SeekOut1
- Widest raw gap
- Article 11 Technical Documentation60 vs 35
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
hackajob and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only hackajob is in scope of
| Record | hackajob | SeekOut |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight28% of the movement so far
hackajob60SeekOut355.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight48% of the movement so far
hackajob20SeekOut403.6 weighted points to SeekOut
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight67% of the movement so far
hackajob58SeekOut353.4 weighted points to hackajob
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight79% of the movement so far
hackajob60SeekOut352.0 weighted points to hackajob
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight87% of the movement so far
hackajob38SeekOut251.6 weighted points to hackajob
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
hackajob55SeekOut451.2 weighted points to hackajob
- 7
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
hackajob32SeekOut251.1 weighted points to hackajob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hackajob minus SeekOut, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | hackajob | SeekOut | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +5.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 40 | -20 | -3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 25 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 35 | +23 | +3.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 35 | +25 | +2.0 |
| Total | 100% | 45F | 34F | +11 | +10.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hackajob | SeekOut | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 38 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hackajob has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 38 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 42 for hackajob, across 2 distinct source domains, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hackajob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SeekOut last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against