Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Jobylon
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
2 points separate Jobylon and HackerEarth.
Jobylon (ATS-integrated) edges HackerEarth (Assessment) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 48 to 46. HackerEarth takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Jobylon, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure, and 1 is level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and HackerEarth holds it (HackerEarth 35, Jobylon 28, 18% weight), worth 100% of the weighted advantage HackerEarth builds across the 1 criterion it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth1
- Jobylon5
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 28
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HackerEarth is in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight33% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Jobylon281.3 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight56% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Jobylon580.9 weighted points to Jobylon
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight72% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Jobylon360.6 weighted points to Jobylon
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight84% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Jobylon600.5 weighted points to Jobylon
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight94% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Jobylon450.4 weighted points to Jobylon
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Jobylon600.2 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Jobylon, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 36 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 48F | -2 | -1.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.