Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Maki People
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Concerning
Assessment
The result
Maki People leads HackerEarth on all 7 criteria.
Maki People finishes 21 points clear of HackerEarth inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 67 (D) against 46 (F). Maki People takes all 7 criteria and HackerEarth none of them; the nearest contest is Article 11 Technical Documentation, HackerEarth 55 to Maki People 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerEarth 35, Maki People 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth0
- Maki People7
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 80
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth and Maki People are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight40% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Maki People808.1 weighted points to Maki People
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight62% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Maki People624.5 weighted points to Maki People
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight71% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Maki People641.8 weighted points to Maki People
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight80% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Maki People641.8 weighted points to Maki People
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight87% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Maki People551.6 weighted points to Maki People
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight94% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Maki People741.4 weighted points to Maki People
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Maki People661.2 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Maki People, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 80 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 62 | -30 | -4.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 64 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 66 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 74 | -17 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 67D | -21 | -20.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.