Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Oracle Recruiting
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Oracle Recruiting
Oracle Recruiting (part of Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM, formerly Oracle Recruiting Cloud) is an enterprise applicant tracking system whose embedded AI suggests and ranks candidates, finds similar candidates, and generates 0-5 generative-AI match ratings against job requisitions to assist recruiters.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
3 points separate Oracle Recruiting and HackerEarth.
Oracle Recruiting (ATS-integrated) edges HackerEarth (Assessment) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 49 to 46. Oracle Recruiting leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while HackerEarth leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. Even Data Governance Disclosure, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HackerEarth 52, Oracle Recruiting 60, 15% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage Oracle Recruiting builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth2
- Oracle Recruiting5
- Widest raw gap
- Data Governance Disclosure52 vs 60
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Data Governance Disclosure15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Oracle Recruiting under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HackerEarth is in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Oracle Recruiting |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1977 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight26% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Oracle Recruiting601.2 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight47% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Oracle Recruiting601.0 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight66% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Oracle Recruiting300.9 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight77% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Oracle Recruiting600.5 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight86% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Oracle Recruiting350.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight95% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Oracle Recruiting620.4 weighted points to Oracle Recruiting
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Oracle Recruiting400.2 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -2.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -2.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Oracle Recruiting, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Oracle Recruiting | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 60 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 40 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 49F | -3 | -2.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Oracle Recruiting | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 13 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Oracle Recruiting has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Oracle Recruiting, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Oracle Recruiting last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.