Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Recruitly
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Recruitly
Recruitly is an all-in-one ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies. It includes AI candidate matching, which ranks candidates against live jobs and shows its reasons, and AI application review, which scores and explains each applicant against the job spec. It also offers external profile sourcing, CV parsing, an AI phone system and an AI meeting assistant.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
HackerEarth takes the total, Recruitly takes more of the criteria.
HackerEarth scores 46 and Recruitly 41 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Recruitly leads more of the criteria than HackerEarth — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which HackerEarth leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to HackerEarth. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HackerEarth 35, Recruitly 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 54% of the weighted advantage HackerEarth holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth3
- Recruitly4
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 15
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HackerEarth is in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Recruitly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight45% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Recruitly153.6 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight70% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Recruitly452.0 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight83% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Recruitly451.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight89% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Recruitly600.5 weighted points to Recruitly
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Recruitly350.4 weighted points to Recruitly
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight99% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Recruitly450.4 weighted points to Recruitly
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Recruitly580.1 weighted points to Recruitly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +5.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +5.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Recruitly, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Recruitly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 15 | +20 | +3.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 35 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 58 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 41F | +5 | +5.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Recruitly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 32 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 76 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitly last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.