Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Saville Assessment
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Saville Assessment
Saville Assessment publishes the Wave personality questionnaires, Swift aptitude tests and situational judgment tests. They are scored automatically against norm groups and delivered through the Oasys platform, the Wave Connect hiring platform (which uses AI to build role profiles from job descriptions) and a two-minute Screener that returns a fit band into the employer's ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
2 points separate Saville Assessment and HackerEarth.
Within the Assessment cohort, Saville Assessment edges HackerEarth by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 48 to 46. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Saville Assessment: Saville Assessment is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and HackerEarth on Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency, at 18%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Saville Assessment (HackerEarth 35, Saville Assessment 42), 40% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is FRIA Support, HackerEarth 32 to Saville Assessment 40.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth3
- Saville Assessment4
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support32 vs 40
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth and Saville Assessment are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Saville Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight27% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Saville Assessment421.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment
- 2
FRIA Support
15% weight52% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Saville Assessment401.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight73% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Saville Assessment501.0 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight83% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Saville Assessment380.5 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight92% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Saville Assessment550.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Saville Assessment600.2 weighted points to Saville Assessment
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Saville Assessment550.1 weighted points to HackerEarth
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Saville Assessment, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Saville Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 40 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 55 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 60 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 48F | -2 | -1.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Saville Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 34 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 79 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Saville Assessment last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.