Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerEarth vs Tenzo AI
HackerEarth
HackerEarth is a technical-hiring platform that auto-scores coding assessments under AI proctoring, runs FaceCode live coding interviews with AI-generated summaries, and offers OnScreen, an AI video-avatar interviewer that scores candidates against a fixed rubric.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Tenzo AI
Tenzo AI's AI recruiter, Morgan, screens and interviews applicants by phone, SMS, email, WhatsApp or video in 40+ languages, scores them against employer-defined rubrics with fraud and identity checks, schedules next rounds, and writes scores, transcripts and recordings back to the customer's ATS.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
Tenzo AI leads HackerEarth by 10 points.
Tenzo AI sits 10 points above HackerEarth under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 46 — with Tenzo AI filed under Screening and HackerEarth under Assessment. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Tenzo AI: Tenzo AI is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and HackerEarth on Article 11 Technical Documentation. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HackerEarth 35, Tenzo AI 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 75% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerEarth1
- Tenzo AI6
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency35 vs 83
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerEarth is filed under Assessment AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerEarth | Tenzo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2024 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight64% of the movement so far
HackerEarth35Tenzo AI838.6 weighted points to Tenzo AI
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight79% of the movement so far
HackerEarth55Tenzo AI452.0 weighted points to HackerEarth
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight88% of the movement so far
HackerEarth32Tenzo AI401.2 weighted points to Tenzo AI
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight91% of the movement so far
HackerEarth56Tenzo AI600.5 weighted points to Tenzo AI
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight94% of the movement so far
HackerEarth52Tenzo AI550.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight97% of the movement so far
HackerEarth57Tenzo AI620.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerEarth42Tenzo AI450.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerEarth minus Tenzo AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerEarth | Tenzo AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 45 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 83 | -48 | -8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 32 | 40 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 60 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 45 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 46F | 56F | -10 | -9.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerEarth | Tenzo AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 8 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 34 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HackerEarth has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 73 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for HackerEarth, across 1 distinct source domain, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerEarth last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tenzo AI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.