Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerRank vs Hogan Assessments
HackerRank
HackerRank is a technical skills assessment platform for developer hiring that uses coding tests, interviews, and AI-based features (question generation, ML plagiarism/AI-code detection, and image-analysis proctoring) to evaluate candidates.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
HackerRank leads Hogan Assessments by 8 points.
Inside the Assessment cohort, rubric v1.0 puts HackerRank on 55 and Hogan Assessments on 47, 8 points apart. HackerRank leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Hogan Assessments leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HackerRank 68, Hogan Assessments 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 52% of the weighted advantage HackerRank holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerRank5
- Hogan Assessments1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 44
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerRank and Hogan Assessments are both filed under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerRank | Hogan Assessments |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2009 | 1987 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight51% of the movement so far
HackerRank68Hogan Assessments444.3 weighted points to HackerRank
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight75% of the movement so far
HackerRank60Hogan Assessments502.0 weighted points to HackerRank
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
HackerRank60Hogan Assessments521.0 weighted points to HackerRank
- 4
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight93% of the movement so far
HackerRank45Hogan Assessments400.6 weighted points to HackerRank
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
HackerRank55Hogan Assessments520.4 weighted points to HackerRank
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerRank35Hogan Assessments360.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +8.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerRank minus Hogan Assessments, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerRank | Hogan Assessments | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 44 | +24 | +4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 36 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 52 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 40 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 62 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 55F | 47F | +8 | +8.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerRank | Hogan Assessments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerRank has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HackerRank sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for HackerRank, across 3 distinct source domains, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerRank last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.