Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HackerRank vs Toggl Hire
HackerRank
HackerRank is a technical skills assessment platform for developer hiring that uses coding tests, interviews, and AI-based features (question generation, ML plagiarism/AI-code detection, and image-analysis proctoring) to evaluate candidates.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
HackerRank leads Toggl Hire on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, HackerRank opens an 18-point lead on Toggl Hire, 55 to 37, with both scored in the Assessment cohort. Toggl Hire is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: HackerRank takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, HackerRank 35 to Toggl Hire 30. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HackerRank 68, Toggl Hire 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage HackerRank holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- HackerRank6
- Toggl Hire0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency68 vs 20
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
HackerRank and Toggl Hire are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | HackerRank | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | EE |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight47% of the movement so far
HackerRank68Toggl Hire208.6 weighted points to HackerRank
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight79% of the movement so far
HackerRank60Toggl Hire306.0 weighted points to HackerRank
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight86% of the movement so far
HackerRank45Toggl Hire351.2 weighted points to HackerRank
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight91% of the movement so far
HackerRank60Toggl Hire521.0 weighted points to HackerRank
- 5
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
HackerRank62Toggl Hire501.0 weighted points to HackerRank
- 6
FRIA Support
15% weight100% of the movement so far
HackerRank35Toggl Hire300.8 weighted points to HackerRank
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +18.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +18 beside that +18.5.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HackerRank minus Toggl Hire, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | HackerRank | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 60 | 30 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 68 | 20 | +48 | +8.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 55 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 35 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 50 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 55F | 37F | +18 | +18.5 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HackerRank | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 14 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HackerRank has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HackerRank sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 32 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for HackerRank, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HackerRank last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.