Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Handshake vs HeyMilo
Handshake
Handshake is an early-career recruiting network whose employer tools use AI to rank applicants against employer-set criteria, find and message matching students and graduates, and target job promotions.
Substantial gaps
Screening
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Concerning
Screening
The result
HeyMilo leads Handshake by 11 points.
Both filed under Screening, HeyMilo and Handshake come out 61 (D) and 50 (F) under rubric v1.0, 11 points in favour of HeyMilo. HeyMilo leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Handshake leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Handshake 52, HeyMilo 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Handshake1
- HeyMilo6
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency52 vs 83
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Handshake and HeyMilo are both filed under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HeyMilo is in scope of
| Record | Handshake | HeyMilo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2014 | 2023 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight48% of the movement so far
Handshake52HeyMilo835.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight66% of the movement so far
Handshake48HeyMilo582.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 3
FRIA Support
15% weight81% of the movement so far
Handshake30HeyMilo421.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight88% of the movement so far
Handshake57HeyMilo620.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Handshake58HeyMilo640.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight98% of the movement so far
Handshake60HeyMilo660.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Handshake48HeyMilo460.2 weighted points to Handshake
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Handshake minus HeyMilo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Handshake | HeyMilo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 52 | 83 | -31 | -5.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 42 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 62 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 48 | 46 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 50F | 61D | -11 | -11.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Handshake | HeyMilo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Handshake has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Handshake and HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Handshake, across 2 distinct source domains, and 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Handshake last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against