Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Handshake vs Oleeo
Handshake
Handshake is an early-career recruiting network whose employer tools use AI to rank applicants against employer-set criteria, find and message matching students and graduates, and target job promotions.
Substantial gaps
Screening
Oleeo
Oleeo is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition platform that uses machine learning to score, rank, and screen candidates from resumes, applications, and assessment responses, with prescriptive interview and hire recommendations and a stated diversity/bias-mitigation focus.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Handshake leads Oleeo on all 7 criteria.
Handshake sits 10 points above Oleeo under rubric v1.0 — 50 against 40 — with Handshake filed under Screening and Oleeo under ATS-integrated. Handshake is ahead of Oleeo on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Human Oversight Design at Handshake 58 to Oleeo 55. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Handshake 48, Oleeo 30) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Bias Audit Transparency at 18% (Handshake 52, Oleeo 40), 23% of the weighted advantage Handshake builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Handshake7
- Oleeo0
- Widest raw gap
- Post-Market Monitoring48 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Handshake is filed under Screening AI, Oleeo under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Handshake | Oleeo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2014 | 1995 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight23% of the movement so far
Handshake52Oleeo402.2 weighted points to Handshake
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight47% of the movement so far
Handshake48Oleeo302.2 weighted points to Handshake
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight66% of the movement so far
Handshake57Oleeo451.8 weighted points to Handshake
- 4
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight84% of the movement so far
Handshake48Oleeo401.6 weighted points to Handshake
- 5
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Handshake30Oleeo250.8 weighted points to Handshake
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight96% of the movement so far
Handshake60Oleeo550.4 weighted points to Handshake
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Handshake58Oleeo550.4 weighted points to Handshake
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +10 beside that +9.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Handshake minus Oleeo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Handshake | Oleeo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 48 | 40 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 45 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 48 | 30 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 55 | +5 | +0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 50F | 40F | +10 | +9.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Handshake | Oleeo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Handshake has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Oleeo has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Handshake sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Handshake, across 2 distinct source domains, and 16 for Oleeo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Handshake last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Oleeo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.