Oleeo

Name: Oleeo
Brand: Oleeo

Oleeo is an enterprise applicant tracking and talent acquisition platform that uses machine learning to score, rank, and screen candidates from resumes, applications, and assessment responses, with prescriptive interview and hire recommendations and a stated diversity/bias-mitigation focus.

ATS-integrated Screening

HireAIScore rates Oleeo 40 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed June 7, 2026. Oleeo ranks 66 of 77 vendors rated in ATS-integrated AI, against a category average of 47. That score is drawn from 16 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Oleeo — 10 with a cited source, 6 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

Oleeo, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20% · category avg 51
40
+8.0
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18% · category avg 41
40
+7.2
FRIA Support
Weight 15% · category avg 32
25
+3.8
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15% · category avg 54
45
+6.8
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12% · category avg 57
55
+6.6
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12% · category avg 42
30
+3.6
Customer Documentation
Weight 8% · category avg 59
55
+4.4

Total weighted score

40.3(rounded to 40 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 77 ATS-integrated AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Customer Documentation

55raw / 100

Contributes 4.4 to the total. 55 against a 59 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

25raw / 100

Contributes 3.8 to the total. 25 against a 32 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items: 16
Documentation: 10
Absence: 6
With a source URL: 10 of 16
Source hostnames: 1
Fewest items: 1; FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly Oleeo was reviewed, not how Oleeo performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items40

DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
AI Candidate Screening page states the technology is 'Ethical by Design' and 'backed up with comprehensive validation studies & compliance documentation,' but links no actual documentation.
https://www.oleeo.com/products/ai-candidate-screening/
DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Intelligent Assessment Scoring page claims the model is 'performance assessed using inter-rater reliability techniques as well as de-biasing procedures' and 'tested to ensure consistency with the scoring approach designed by government statisticians,' but offers only a marketing datasheet, no technical/validation pack.
https://www.oleeo.com/resources/intelligent-assessment-scoring/
AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No model card, system card, ISO 42001 reference, or instructions-for-use document was found across product, resource, or about sections of oleeo.com.
Have a URL that disputes this?

Bias Audit Transparency

2 items40

DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Intelligent Selection page claims algorithms are 'optimised to ensure no adverse selection,' implying fairness testing, but cites no auditor, date, or downloadable audit.
https://www.oleeo.com/resources/intelligent-selection/
AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Searches for an Oleeo NYC Local Law 144 AEDT bias audit and for third-party auditors (Warden AI, Holistic AI, BABL AI, DCI, ORCAA) returned no published Oleeo audit; the diversity solution page mentions no adverse-impact testing, four-fifths analysis, or independent audit.
Have a URL that disputes this?

FRIA Support

1 item25

AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template, Art. 26/27 deployer guidance, or EU AI Act high-risk content was found on oleeo.com; the site's only EU reference is a generic GDPR-compliance claim on the Intelligent Selection page.
Have a URL that disputes this?

Data Governance Disclosure

3 items45

DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Blog post lists ISO 27001 ('ISO 271' typo) and 'Cyber Essentials Plus certification (For UK Public Sector)' among supplier security credentials and states 'Oleeo ticks all these boxes.'
https://www.oleeo.com/blog/protecting-candidate-data/
DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
States models analyze 'data points found in CV/resumes, application forms and online test scores' and historical hiring data, giving partial visibility into inputs but no formal exclusion list.
https://www.oleeo.com/resources/intelligent-selection/
AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No dedicated trust/security center, downloadable ISO 27001 certificate, SOC 2 report, or explicit training-data exclusion list was located on oleeo.com.
Have a URL that disputes this?

Human Oversight Design

2 items55

DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
AI Candidate Screening describes a 3-step flow where the recruiter reviews evidence and, 'If you disagree with the recommendation, the candidate's ranking is changed to reflect your decision,' an explicit human override; the tool 'summarises the evidence to support its recommendation.'
https://www.oleeo.com/products/ai-candidate-screening/
DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Intelligent Assessment Scoring states the tool 'is intended to support and not replace recruiters,' framing AI as decision support with human review retained.
https://www.oleeo.com/resources/intelligent-assessment-scoring/

Post-Market Monitoring

2 items30

DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Blog references 'robust incident management procedures' and regular security audits, but no public incident or vulnerability-disclosure channel is surfaced.
https://www.oleeo.com/blog/protecting-candidate-data/
AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No public status page, trust center, security.txt/vulnerability-disclosure page, continuous-monitoring dashboard, or model-update changelog was found for Oleeo.
Have a URL that disputes this?

Customer Documentation

3 items55

DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Detailed public Diversity solution page describing bias-mitigation features (job-post de-biasing, demographic analytics, structured interviews), one of many product/solution pages.
https://www.oleeo.com/solutions/diversity/
DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Public AI Candidate Screening product page documenting inputs, the human-review workflow, and ethical-design positioning for prospective deployers.
https://www.oleeo.com/products/ai-candidate-screening/
AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No publicly linked DPA, deployer compliance guidance, or NYC Local Law 144 / EU AI Act customer-facing documentation was found; the homepage footer exposes only generic Privacy Statement, Terms, and Cookie Policy.
Have a URL that disputes this?

Editorial notes

Company overview

Oleeo (formerly World Careers Network / WCN, founded 1995 and rebranded in 2018) is a UK-headquartered enterprise recruiting platform based in Wimbledon, London, with additional offices in New York and Vietnam. Its suite combines a multi-award-winning ATS and recruitment CRM with a 'Data Science' layer - Intelligent Selection (predictive five-star scoring of skills, cultural fit, offer-acceptance and retention probability), AI Candidate Screening, and Intelligent Assessment Scoring of free-text competency answers. The product is heavily marketed to high-volume and diversity-focused employers (finance, police, public sector, NHS, campus), positioning AI as a way to surface strong candidates who might be missed in manual review while 'reducing unconscious bias.'

Regulatory exposure

Oleeo's AI tools score and rank candidates for employment decisions, squarely placing them in scope of NYC Local Law 144 (as an AEDT) and the EU AI Act's high-risk Annex III employment category, with adjacent exposure to Illinois and Colorado AI-hiring rules. Oleeo markets itself as 'Ethical by Design' and claims algorithms 'optimised to ensure no adverse selection' and to 'deliver regulatory compliance to laws such as GDPR in the EU and EEOC in the US,' but it publishes no model/system card, no independent NYC LL 144 bias audit, no FRIA/deployer guidance, and no downloadable validation study. Its strongest verifiable evidence is operational (human-in-the-loop override, evidence-based explanations) and security-oriented (ISO 27001), not transparency documentation that a regulator or deployer could rely on.

Path to a higher score

The fastest gains are in bias-audit transparency and technical documentation: commission and publicly post an independent NYC LL 144-style bias audit (e.g., Warden AI, Holistic AI, BABL AI, DCI) with auditor and date, and publish the 'comprehensive validation studies' it repeatedly references but never links. Oleeo should add a model/system card and explainability statement describing data used and excluded, plus deployer-facing EU AI Act guidance (Art. 26/27, FRIA template) and an NYC LL 144 compliance page. A public trust/security center with a vulnerability-disclosure channel, status page, and ISO 27001 certificate would lift data-governance and post-market-monitoring scores from their current near-absence.

Regulatory frame

What applies to ATS-integrated AI.

Ranking features are inside EU AI Act Annex III §4 (high-risk) and inside NYC Local Law 144 when they affect NYC-based candidates. Customers should treat the AI surface as a distinct deployer-FRIA scope from the rest of the ATS.

Keep reading

All ATS-integrated vendors How this score is built Annex IV section-by-section: what AI hiring vendors must document What makes a defensible NYC LL 144 bias audit

Compare

Oleeo against its nearest-scoring peers.

The closest scores in ATS-integrated AI, side by side.

Build any comparison

Ranking

Others rated in ATS-integrated AI

Ranked 66 of 77 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

All ATS-integrated vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.