Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs hireEZ
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
hireEZ
AI-powered outbound recruiting platform that sources, matches, screens, engages, and schedules candidates on top of a customer's existing ATS.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
1 point separates hireEZ and Harri.
hireEZ (Sourcing) edges Harri (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 42 to 41. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of hireEZ: hireEZ is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Harri on FRIA Support. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, FRIA Support, and Harri holds it (Harri 44, hireEZ 25, 15% weight), worth 88% of the weighted advantage Harri builds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri3
- hireEZ4
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, hireEZ under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Harri | hireEZ |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight40% of the movement so far
Harri44hireEZ252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Harri22hireEZ301.4 weighted points to hireEZ
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight76% of the movement so far
Harri52hireEZ601.2 weighted points to hireEZ
- 4
Human Oversight Design
12% weight86% of the movement so far
Harri52hireEZ580.7 weighted points to hireEZ
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight94% of the movement so far
Harri35hireEZ380.6 weighted points to hireEZ
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Harri40hireEZ380.2 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60hireEZ580.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.7.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus hireEZ, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | hireEZ | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 60 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 42F | -1 | -0.7 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | hireEZ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- hireEZ last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.