Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs HirePro
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
HirePro
HirePro's AI Recruiter matches resumes to a job, shortlists candidates and runs AI-led interviews that score each answer with written reasoning and a fraud and identity check, alongside proctored assessments, video interviews and campus-hiring workflows.
Substantial gaps
Screening
The result
3 points separate Harri and HirePro.
Harri (ATS-integrated) edges HirePro (Screening) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 41 to 38. Harri leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while HirePro leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, FRIA Support, is both the widest raw gap (Harri 44, HirePro 25) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 53% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri5
- HirePro2
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HirePro under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only HirePro is in scope of
| Record | Harri | HirePro |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2012 | 2004 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight37% of the movement so far
Harri44HirePro252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight62% of the movement so far
Harri22HirePro332.0 weighted points to HirePro
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight75% of the movement so far
Harri35HirePro301.0 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight84% of the movement so far
Harri60HirePro520.6 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight91% of the movement so far
Harri40HirePro350.6 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Harri52HirePro550.4 weighted points to HirePro
- 7
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52HirePro500.3 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +3.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus HirePro, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | HirePro | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 33 | -11 | -2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 52 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 38F | +3 | +3.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | HirePro | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 21 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HirePro has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 27 for HirePro, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HirePro last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.