Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs HireQuotient
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Harri leads HireQuotient by 7 points.
Harri scores 41 and HireQuotient 34 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Harri, with 1 level: Harri is ahead on FRIA Support and HireQuotient on Human Oversight Design. One criterion, FRIA Support, is both the widest raw gap (Harri 44, HireQuotient 22) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 15% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri5
- HireQuotient1
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 22
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only HireQuotient is in scope of
| Record | Harri | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight39% of the movement so far
Harri44HireQuotient223.3 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight61% of the movement so far
Harri52HireQuotient401.8 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight75% of the movement so far
Harri40HireQuotient301.2 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight84% of the movement so far
Harri60HireQuotient500.8 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight93% of the movement so far
Harri22HireQuotient180.7 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52HireQuotient570.6 weighted points to HireQuotient
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +7.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +7.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus HireQuotient, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 35 | - | - |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 18 | +4 | +0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 22 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 57 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 50 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 34F | +7 | +7.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.