Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs JobDiva
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Harri leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 scores the ATS-integrated entries Harri and JobDiva at 41 and 29, a gap of 12 points. Harri takes all 7 criteria and JobDiva none of them; the nearest contest is Article 11 Technical Documentation, Harri 35 to JobDiva 28. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Harri 44, JobDiva 22, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri7
- JobDiva0
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 22
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Harri is in scope of
| Record | Harri | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2003 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight27% of the movement so far
Harri44JobDiva223.3 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight44% of the movement so far
Harri52JobDiva382.1 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight56% of the movement so far
Harri52JobDiva401.4 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight68% of the movement so far
Harri60JobDiva421.4 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight80% of the movement so far
Harri35JobDiva281.4 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight90% of the movement so far
Harri22JobDiva151.3 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri40JobDiva301.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.1.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus JobDiva, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 15 | +7 | +1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 22 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 42 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 29F | +12 | +12.1 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
Scored against