Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads Harri by 16 points.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) finishes 16 points clear of Harri under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 41 — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of Juicebox (PeopleGPT), with 1 level: Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Harri on FRIA Support. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Harri 22, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 66% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri2
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT)4
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency22 vs 84
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Bias Audit Transparency18% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Harri | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Harri22Juicebox (PeopleGPT)8411.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight78% of the movement so far
Harri35Juicebox (PeopleGPT)523.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 3
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight88% of the movement so far
Harri40Juicebox (PeopleGPT)551.8 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight95% of the movement so far
Harri44Juicebox (PeopleGPT)351.3 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight99% of the movement so far
Harri52Juicebox (PeopleGPT)560.6 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
- 6
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52Juicebox (PeopleGPT)500.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -15.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -15.4.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Juicebox (PeopleGPT), coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 52 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 84 | -62 | -11.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 56 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 60 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 57F | -16 | -15.4 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.