Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Loxo
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Loxo
Loxo is an AI-native talent-intelligence platform that combines candidate sourcing, a recruiting CRM, and an applicant tracking system, using proprietary ranking models and a self-built talent graph of 800M+ people to source, rank, and match candidates for recruiting and staffing firms.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Harri leads Loxo on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Harri holds a 4-point edge over Loxo under rubric v1.0, 41 to 37, across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Loxo is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Harri takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Bias Audit Transparency, Harri 22 to Loxo 20. FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Harri 44, Loxo 30 — and at a 15% weight it carries 50% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri6
- Loxo0
- Level1
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Loxo under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Harri is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Loxo |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight50% of the movement so far
Harri44Loxo302.1 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight75% of the movement so far
Harri35Loxo301.0 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight83% of the movement so far
Harri22Loxo200.4 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight90% of the movement so far
Harri52Loxo500.3 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight96% of the movement so far
Harri52Loxo500.2 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60Loxo580.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.2.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Loxo, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Loxo | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 20 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 40 | - | - |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 37F | +4 | +4.2 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Loxo | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Loxo last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.