Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Moonhub
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Moonhub
Moonhub is an AI recruiting platform whose agents (Qualify AI, Engage AI, Monitor AI) search, score, outreach to, and engage candidates across more than a billion public and proprietary profiles, working alongside human expert recruiters who vet candidates before presenting them.
Substantial gaps
Sourcing
The result
Harri leads Moonhub on all 7 criteria.
Harri, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 11 points above Moonhub, filed under Sourcing: 41 against 30 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria Moonhub wins none, and the narrowest lead Harri holds is on Bias Audit Transparency, Harri 22 to Moonhub 18. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Customer Documentation (Harri 60, Moonhub 38) and FRIA Support at 15% (Harri 44, Moonhub 25), the second being 26% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri7
- Moonhub0
- Widest raw gap
- Customer Documentation60 vs 38
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Moonhub under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
| Record | Harri | Moonhub |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2022 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight26% of the movement so far
Harri44Moonhub252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight47% of the movement so far
Harri40Moonhub222.2 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight63% of the movement so far
Harri52Moonhub401.8 weighted points to Harri
- 4
Customer Documentation
8% weight80% of the movement so far
Harri60Moonhub381.8 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight89% of the movement so far
Harri35Moonhub301.0 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight96% of the movement so far
Harri22Moonhub180.7 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52Moonhub480.5 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Moonhub, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Moonhub | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 30 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 18 | +4 | +0.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 48 | +4 | +0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 22 | +18 | +2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 38 | +22 | +1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 30F | +11 | +10.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Moonhub | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Moonhub has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 13 for Moonhub, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Moonhub last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.