Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Paylocity
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Paylocity
Paylocity is a cloud-based HCM and payroll platform whose talent suite includes an applicant tracking system with generative-AI job-description and invite drafting, one-way video interviews, candidate self-scheduling, and a conversational "AI Assistant."
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
2 points separate Paylocity and Harri.
Paylocity holds a 2-point edge over Harri under rubric v1.0, 43 to 41, with both scored in the ATS-integrated cohort. The 7 criteria split 4 to 3 in favour of Paylocity: Paylocity is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Harri on FRIA Support. FRIA Support is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Harri — Harri 44, Paylocity 30, on a 15% weight — which is 84% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri3
- Paylocity4
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 30
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri and Paylocity are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of
Only Paylocity is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Paylocity |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 1997 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight31% of the movement so far
Harri44Paylocity302.1 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight60% of the movement so far
Harri22Paylocity332.0 weighted points to Paylocity
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight86% of the movement so far
Harri35Paylocity441.8 weighted points to Paylocity
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight91% of the movement so far
Harri52Paylocity540.3 weighted points to Paylocity
- 5
Human Oversight Design
12% weight94% of the movement so far
Harri52Paylocity500.2 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight98% of the movement so far
Harri40Paylocity420.2 weighted points to Paylocity
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60Paylocity580.2 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -1.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.8.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Paylocity, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Paylocity | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 44 | -9 | -1.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 33 | -11 | -2.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 30 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 54 | -2 | -0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 50 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 43F | -2 | -1.8 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Paylocity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Paylocity has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Paylocity, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Paylocity last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.