Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Turing
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
Substantial gaps
Assessment
The result
Harri leads Turing by 5 points.
Harri scores 41 and Turing 36 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Turing takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them, against 5 for Harri, whose share includes FRIA Support. The advantage Harri holds is spread out: FRIA Support is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Harri 44, Turing 25, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Harri gains across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri5
- Turing2
- Widest raw gap
- FRIA Support44 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- FRIA Support15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Turing is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2018 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
FRIA Support
15% weight29% of the movement so far
Harri44Turing252.9 weighted points to Harri
- 2
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight45% of the movement so far
Harri40Turing271.6 weighted points to Harri
- 3
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight59% of the movement so far
Harri35Turing421.4 weighted points to Turing
- 4
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight71% of the movement so far
Harri52Turing441.2 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight82% of the movement so far
Harri22Turing281.1 weighted points to Turing
- 6
Customer Documentation
8% weight92% of the movement so far
Harri60Turing481.0 weighted points to Harri
- 7
Human Oversight Design
12% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri52Turing450.8 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.9.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Turing, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -1.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 25 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 44 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 27 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 48 | +12 | +1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 36F | +5 | +4.9 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.