§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Harri by 15 points.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 15 points clear of Harri inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 41. Workday Recruiting AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Harri leads 2, including FRIA Support. Workday Recruiting AI takes the heaviest weighted swing, Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Harri 35, Workday Recruiting AI 70), which is 43% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds; the widest raw gap is a different criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, Harri 22 to Workday Recruiting AI 60.
Vendor profile
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
Harri and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Harri is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Harri | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Harri 35 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
7.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Harri 22 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
6.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Harri 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Harri 44 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.3 weighted points to Harri
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Harri 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Harri
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Harri 52 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Harri 60 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
0.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 60 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 41 (F) | 56 (F) | -15 | -14.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next