Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Harri vs Workday Recruiting AI
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
Substantial gaps
ATS-integrated
The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads Harri by 15 points.
Workday Recruiting AI finishes 15 points clear of Harri inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 41. Workday Recruiting AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Harri leads 2, including FRIA Support. Article 11 Technical Documentation, at 20%, is the heaviest weighted swing and goes to Workday Recruiting AI (Harri 35, Workday Recruiting AI 70), 43% of the weighted advantage it holds, while the widest raw gap is Bias Audit Transparency, Harri 22 to Workday Recruiting AI 60.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- Harri2
- Workday Recruiting AI5
- Widest raw gap
- Bias Audit Transparency22 vs 60
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
Harri and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of
Only Harri is in scope of
| Record | Harri | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2012 | 2005 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Article 11 Technical Documentation
20% weight38% of the movement so far
Harri35Workday Recruiting AI707.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
- 2
Bias Audit Transparency
18% weight76% of the movement so far
Harri22Workday Recruiting AI606.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
- 3
Human Oversight Design
12% weight85% of the movement so far
Harri52Workday Recruiting AI651.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
- 4
FRIA Support
15% weight92% of the movement so far
Harri44Workday Recruiting AI351.3 weighted points to Harri
- 5
Post-Market Monitoring
12% weight95% of the movement so far
Harri40Workday Recruiting AI350.6 weighted points to Harri
- 6
Data Governance Disclosure
15% weight98% of the movement so far
Harri52Workday Recruiting AI550.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
- 7
Customer Documentation
8% weight100% of the movement so far
Harri60Workday Recruiting AI650.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -14.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -15 beside that -14.3.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Harri minus Workday Recruiting AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | Harri | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 35 | 70 | -35 | -7.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 60 | -38 | -6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 44 | 35 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 55 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 52 | 65 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 65 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 41F | 56F | -15 | -14.3 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Harri | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.