§ The result
HeyMilo leads isolved by 14 points.
HeyMilo sits 14 points above isolved under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 47 (F) — with HeyMilo filed under Screening and isolved under ATS-integrated. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of HeyMilo: HeyMilo is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and isolved on Post-Market Monitoring. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HeyMilo 83, isolved 45) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 51% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
isolved
isolved is a US HCM and payroll provider whose isolved Talent Acquisition applicant tracking system (formerly ApplicantPro) uses AI Candidate Matching to score each applicant's resume against the job description and sort the applicant list, alongside AI job-ad writing and WedgeHR-powered one-way video interviews.
§ The record
HeyMilo is filed under Screening AI, isolved under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | isolved |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 1986 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · isolved 45
6.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · isolved 30
1.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · isolved 50
1.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · isolved 53
1.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · isolved 55
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · isolved 56
0.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · isolved 47
0.1 weighted points to isolved
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +13.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +14 beside that +13.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus isolved.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | isolved | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 45 | +38 | +6.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 30 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 53 | +9 | +1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 55 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 47 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 56 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 47 (F) | +14 | +13.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | isolved | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 31 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; isolved has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and isolved sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 36 for isolved, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- isolved last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next