§ The result
HeyMilo leads Qureos on all 7 criteria.
HeyMilo and Qureos, both Screening entries, are 28 points apart under rubric v1.0, 61 (D) for HeyMilo against 33 (F) for Qureos. Of the 7 criteria Qureos wins none, and the narrowest lead HeyMilo holds is on Human Oversight Design, HeyMilo 64 to Qureos 54. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 83, Qureos 12 — and at an 18% weight it carries 46% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
§ The record
HeyMilo and Qureos are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · Qureos 12
12.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · Qureos 28
6.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · Qureos 44
2.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · Qureos 25
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · Qureos 35
1.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · Qureos 54
1.2 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · Qureos 52
1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +27.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus Qureos.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 28 | +30 | +6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 12 | +71 | +12.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 44 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 54 | +10 | +1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 35 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 52 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 33 (F) | +28 | +27.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next