HomeCompareHeyMilo vs Tenzo AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

HeyMilo vs Tenzo AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

HeyMilo leads Tenzo AI on 6 of the 7 criteria.

HeyMilo scores 61 (D) and Tenzo AI 56 (F) under rubric v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the Screening cohort. Tenzo AI is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: HeyMilo takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Post-Market Monitoring, HeyMilo 46 to Tenzo AI 45. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 58, Tenzo AI 45 — and at a 20% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

HeyMilo and Tenzo AI are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordHeyMiloTenzo AI
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20232024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 53% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    HeyMilo 58 · Tenzo AI 45

    2.6 weighted points to HeyMilo

  2. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    HeyMilo 62 · Tenzo AI 55

    1.1 weighted points to HeyMilo

  3. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    HeyMilo 64 · Tenzo AI 60

    0.5 weighted points to HeyMilo

  4. 8% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    HeyMilo 66 · Tenzo AI 62

    0.3 weighted points to HeyMilo

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    HeyMilo 42 · Tenzo AI 40

    0.3 weighted points to HeyMilo

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    HeyMilo 46 · Tenzo AI 45

    0.1 weighted points to HeyMilo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is HeyMilo minus Tenzo AI.

CategoryWeightHeyMiloTenzo AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5845+13+2.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%8383--
FRIA Support15%4240+2+0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6460+4+0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4645+1+0.1
Customer Documentation8%6662+4+0.3
Total100%61 (D)56 (F)+5+4.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightHeyMiloTenzo AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%183Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain304Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
HeyMilo last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tenzo AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.