§ The result
HeyMilo leads Workstream on all 7 criteria.
The Screening cohort pairing of HeyMilo and Workstream comes out 61 (D) to 39 (F) under rubric v1.0, a 22-point lead for HeyMilo. HeyMilo takes all 7 criteria and Workstream none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, HeyMilo 64 to Workstream 61. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HeyMilo 83, Workstream 20 — and at an 18% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
Workstream
Workstream is a mobile-first HR, payroll and hiring platform for hourly, multi-location employers such as QSR franchisees. Its hiring suite pairs a text-to-apply applicant tracking system with VoiceAI phone screens and VideoAI asynchronous video interviews, which return transcripts, AI summaries, pass/fail results for each question and match scores.
§ The record
HeyMilo and Workstream are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | Workstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · Workstream 20
11.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · Workstream 40
3.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 78% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · Workstream 27
2.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · Workstream 47
2.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · Workstream 35
1.3 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · Workstream 56
0.8 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · Workstream 61
0.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +21.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +22 beside that +21.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus Workstream.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | Workstream | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 40 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 20 | +63 | +11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 27 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 47 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 61 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 35 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 56 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 39 (F) | +22 | +21.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | Workstream | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo and Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workstream last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next