§ The result
HeyMilo leads XOR on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 separates HeyMilo and XOR, both Screening entries, by 31 points: 61 (D) for HeyMilo, 30 (F) for XOR. HeyMilo leads every one of the 7 criteria and 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; XOR leads none. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (HeyMilo 83, XOR 18, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage HeyMilo holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HeyMilo
HeyMilo is an AI recruiter for high-volume hiring whose voice and video AI agent conducts and scores async and live conversational screening interviews against recruiter-defined rubrics and syncs results to the customer's ATS.
Vendor profile
XOR
XOR is a text-first conversational-AI recruiting platform that pre-screens and scores high-volume and hourly candidates with recruiter-defined knockout/scoring questions over SMS, WhatsApp, and Messenger, then auto-schedules interviews on the recruiter's calendar.
§ The record
HeyMilo and XOR are both filed under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only HeyMilo is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HeyMilo | XOR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HeyMilo 83 · XOR 18
11.7 weighted points to HeyMilo
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HeyMilo 58 · XOR 20
7.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HeyMilo 62 · XOR 42
3.0 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HeyMilo 64 · XOR 40
2.9 weighted points to HeyMilo
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HeyMilo 42 · XOR 25
2.5 weighted points to HeyMilo
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HeyMilo 46 · XOR 33
1.6 weighted points to HeyMilo
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HeyMilo 66 · XOR 48
1.4 weighted points to HeyMilo
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +30.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 30.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +31 beside that +30.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HeyMilo minus XOR.
| Category | Weight | HeyMilo | XOR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 58 | 20 | +38 | +7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 18 | +65 | +11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 42 | 25 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 42 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 64 | 40 | +24 | +2.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 46 | 33 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 48 | +18 | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 30 (F) | +31 | +30.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HeyMilo | XOR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 18 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HeyMilo has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; XOR has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for HeyMilo sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for HeyMilo, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for XOR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HeyMilo last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- XOR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next