§ The result
HiBob leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
HiBob sits 12 points above HireQuotient under rubric v1.0 — 46 against 34 — with HiBob filed under ATS-integrated and HireQuotient under Sourcing. HiBob takes all 7 criteria and HireQuotient none of them; the nearest contest is Bias Audit Transparency, HiBob 20 to HireQuotient 18. The advantage HiBob holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HiBob 55, HireQuotient 35, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 32% of the weighted points HiBob gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
§ The record
HiBob is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HireQuotient under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiBob | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | GB | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiBob 55 · HireQuotient 35
4.0 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiBob 57 · HireQuotient 40
2.5 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiBob 47 · HireQuotient 30
2.0 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiBob 35 · HireQuotient 22
1.9 weighted points to HiBob
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiBob 61 · HireQuotient 50
0.9 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiBob 63 · HireQuotient 57
0.7 weighted points to HiBob
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiBob 20 · HireQuotient 18
0.4 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +12 beside that +12.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiBob minus HireQuotient.
| Category | Weight | HiBob | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 18 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 57 | +6 | +0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 30 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 61 | 50 | +11 | +0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 34 (F) | +12 | +12.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiBob | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 65 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next