§ The result
Hogan Assessments takes the total, HiBob takes more of the criteria.
Hogan Assessments (Assessment) edges HiBob (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 47 to 46. HiBob leads more of the criteria than Hogan Assessments — 4 to 3 — but Bias Audit Transparency, which Hogan Assessments leads, carries 18% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to Hogan Assessments. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (HiBob 20, Hogan Assessments 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 95% of the weighted advantage Hogan Assessments holds across the 3 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Vendor profile
Hogan Assessments
Hogan Assessments provides science-based personality assessments - chiefly the Hogan Personality Inventory (HPI), Hogan Development Survey (HDS), and Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory (MVPI) - used to predict workplace performance for employee selection and development.
§ The record
HiBob is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Hogan Assessments under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Hogan Assessments is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | HiBob | Hogan Assessments |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 1987 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiBob 20 · Hogan Assessments 44
4.3 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiBob 63 · Hogan Assessments 52
1.3 weighted points to HiBob
20% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiBob 55 · Hogan Assessments 50
1.0 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiBob 47 · Hogan Assessments 40
0.8 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiBob 57 · Hogan Assessments 52
0.8 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 99% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiBob 35 · Hogan Assessments 36
0.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiBob 61 · Hogan Assessments 62
0.1 weighted points to Hogan Assessments
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -0.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -1 beside that -0.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiBob minus Hogan Assessments.
| Category | Weight | HiBob | Hogan Assessments | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 44 | -24 | -4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 36 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 52 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 52 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 40 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 61 | 62 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 47 (F) | -1 | -0.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiBob | Hogan Assessments | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Hogan Assessments has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 62 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 26 for Hogan Assessments, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Hogan Assessments last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next