§ The result
HiBob leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
HiBob finishes 17 points clear of JobDiva inside the ATS-integrated cohort under rubric v1.0: 46 against 29. Of the 7 criteria JobDiva wins none, and the narrowest lead HiBob holds is on Bias Audit Transparency, HiBob 20 to JobDiva 15. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (HiBob 55, JobDiva 28, 20% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage HiBob builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
HiBob and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only HiBob is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HiBob | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiBob 55 · JobDiva 28
5.4 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiBob 57 · JobDiva 38
2.9 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiBob 63 · JobDiva 40
2.8 weighted points to HiBob
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiBob 47 · JobDiva 30
2.0 weighted points to HiBob
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiBob 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to HiBob
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiBob 61 · JobDiva 42
1.5 weighted points to HiBob
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiBob 20 · JobDiva 15
0.9 weighted points to HiBob
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +17.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +17 beside that +17.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiBob minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | HiBob | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 28 | +27 | +5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 15 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 38 | +19 | +2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 40 | +23 | +2.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 30 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 61 | 42 | +19 | +1.5 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 29 (F) | +17 | +17.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiBob | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next