§ The result
PageUp leads HiBob on all 7 criteria.
The ATS-integrated cohort pairing of PageUp and HiBob comes out 64 (D) to 46 (F) under rubric v1.0, an 18-point lead for PageUp. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria, HiBob none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, HiBob 63 to PageUp 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — HiBob 20, PageUp 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 62% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
HiBob
HiBob's Bob is an all-in-one HR platform whose Bob Hiring applicant tracking module uses AI to give each application an explainable match score against recruiter-defined criteria (AI CV Matching) and to draft job descriptions, interview scorecards and candidate emails.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
HiBob and PageUp are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | HiBob | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | GB | AU |
| Founded | 2015 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
HiBob 20 · PageUp 80
10.8 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
HiBob 55 · PageUp 74
3.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
HiBob 47 · PageUp 55
1.0 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
HiBob 57 · PageUp 63
0.9 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
HiBob 35 · PageUp 40
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
HiBob 61 · PageUp 63
0.2 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
HiBob 63 · PageUp 64
0.1 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiBob minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | HiBob | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 55 | 74 | -19 | -3.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 63 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 64 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 55 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 61 | 63 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 64 (D) | -18 | -17.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | HiBob | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 29 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
HiBob has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 29 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 36 for HiBob, across 4 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- HiBob last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next