Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
HiPeople vs Thomas International
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
Vendor profile
Thomas International
Thomas International provides psychometric and aptitude assessments (behaviour/DISC, cognitive ability, personality and emotional intelligence) with an AI coaching layer, used for hiring, candidate selection and employee development.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is HiPeople minus Thomas International.
| Category | Weight | HiPeople | Thomas International | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 62 | 54 | +8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 43 | +41 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 33 | +2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 57 | +1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 62 | 51 | +11 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 60 | 40 | +20 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 60 | +6 |
| Total | 100% | 61 (D) | 48 (F) | +13 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
HiPeople
31 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 8
- audit report
- 5
Evidence count
Thomas International
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6