§ The result
hireEZ leads HireQuotient on all 7 criteria.
hireEZ finishes 8 points ahead of HireQuotient under rubric v1.0, 42 to 34, both scored as Sourcing entries. hireEZ takes all 7 criteria and HireQuotient none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, hireEZ 58 to HireQuotient 57. The advantage hireEZ holds is spread out: Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (hireEZ 60, HireQuotient 40, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points hireEZ gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
hireEZ
AI-powered outbound recruiting platform that sources, matches, screens, engages, and schedules candidates on top of a customer's existing ATS.
Vendor profile
HireQuotient
EasySource by HireQuotient is an AI recruiting platform for North American frontline employers that sources and scores candidates from LinkedIn, the open web and partner databases, verifies licences, automates outreach including AI voice calls, and adds an ATS, interview scheduling, and skills, cognitive and AI-scored video assessments.
§ The record
hireEZ and HireQuotient are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Scheduling.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HireQuotient is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | hireEZ | HireQuotient |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
hireEZ 60 · HireQuotient 40
3.0 weighted points to hireEZ
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
hireEZ 30 · HireQuotient 18
2.2 weighted points to hireEZ
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
hireEZ 38 · HireQuotient 30
1.0 weighted points to hireEZ
8% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
hireEZ 58 · HireQuotient 50
0.6 weighted points to hireEZ
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
hireEZ 38 · HireQuotient 35
0.6 weighted points to hireEZ
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
hireEZ 25 · HireQuotient 22
0.4 weighted points to hireEZ
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
hireEZ 58 · HireQuotient 57
0.1 weighted points to hireEZ
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +7.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is hireEZ minus HireQuotient.
| Category | Weight | hireEZ | HireQuotient | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 35 | +3 | +0.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 18 | +12 | +2.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 40 | +20 | +3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 57 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 30 | +8 | +1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 50 | +8 | +0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 42 (F) | 34 (F) | +8 | +7.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | hireEZ | HireQuotient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 0 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; HireQuotient has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 29 for HireQuotient, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- hireEZ last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HireQuotient last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next