HomeComparehireEZ vs Loxo

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

hireEZ vs Loxo

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

hireEZ leads Loxo by 5 points.

hireEZ scores 42 and Loxo 37 under rubric v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. hireEZ leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Loxo leads 2, including FRIA Support, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (hireEZ 30, Loxo 20, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage hireEZ holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

hireEZ and Loxo are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only hireEZ is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordhireEZLoxo
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    hireEZ 30 · Loxo 20

    1.8 weighted points to hireEZ

  2. 20% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    hireEZ 38 · Loxo 30

    1.6 weighted points to hireEZ

  3. 15% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    hireEZ 60 · Loxo 50

    1.5 weighted points to hireEZ

  4. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    hireEZ 58 · Loxo 50

    1.0 weighted points to hireEZ

  5. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    hireEZ 25 · Loxo 30

    0.8 weighted points to Loxo

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    hireEZ 38 · Loxo 40

    0.2 weighted points to Loxo

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hireEZ minus Loxo.

CategoryWeighthireEZLoxoΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3830+8+1.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3020+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6050+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%5850+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%42 (F)37 (F)+5+4.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthireEZLoxo
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain11
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%95Sources on the vendor's own domain127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.