HomeComparehireEZ vs SeekOut

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

hireEZ vs SeekOut

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

hireEZ leads SeekOut by 8 points.

hireEZ scores 42 and SeekOut 34 under rubric v1.0 — an 8-point gap inside the Sourcing cohort. hireEZ leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while SeekOut leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — hireEZ 60, SeekOut 35 — and at a 15% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage hireEZ holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

hireEZ and SeekOut are both filed under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only hireEZ is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.

RecordhireEZSeekOut
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20152017

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    hireEZ 60 · SeekOut 35

    3.8 weighted points to hireEZ

  2. 8% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    hireEZ 58 · SeekOut 35

    1.8 weighted points to hireEZ

  3. 18% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    hireEZ 30 · SeekOut 40

    1.8 weighted points to SeekOut

  4. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    hireEZ 58 · SeekOut 45

    1.6 weighted points to hireEZ

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    hireEZ 38 · SeekOut 25

    1.6 weighted points to hireEZ

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    hireEZ 38 · SeekOut 35

    0.6 weighted points to hireEZ

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +7.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +7.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is hireEZ minus SeekOut.

CategoryWeighthireEZSeekOutΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3835+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3040-10-1.8
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6035+25+3.8
Human Oversight Design12%5845+13+1.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3825+13+1.6
Customer Documentation8%5835+23+1.8
Total100%42 (F)34 (F)+8+7.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeighthireEZSeekOut
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%95Sources on the vendor's own domain54Sources on the vendor's own domain

hireEZ has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SeekOut has 9 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 5 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 23 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for hireEZ, across 1 distinct source domain, and 9 for SeekOut, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
hireEZ last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SeekOut last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.