§ The result
Hireology leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Hireology scores 57 to 29 for JobDiva, a 28-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. Hireology leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Hireology 83, JobDiva 15) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 45% of the weighted advantage Hireology holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Hireology
Hireology is an applicant tracking and hiring platform for multi-location auto dealers, healthcare providers and hospitality operators. Its AI features score applicants against employer-defined criteria (AI Match) and run rubric-scored, voice-based first-round screening interviews (AI Interview).
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
§ The record
Hireology and JobDiva are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Hireology is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | Hireology | JobDiva |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2010 | 2003 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Hireology 83 · JobDiva 15
12.2 weighted points to Hireology
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Hireology 50 · JobDiva 28
4.4 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Hireology 59 · JobDiva 30
3.5 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Hireology 52 · JobDiva 38
2.1 weighted points to Hireology
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Hireology 57 · JobDiva 40
2.0 weighted points to Hireology
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Hireology 35 · JobDiva 22
1.9 weighted points to Hireology
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Hireology 58 · JobDiva 42
1.3 weighted points to Hireology
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +28 beside that +27.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Hireology minus JobDiva.
| Category | Weight | Hireology | JobDiva | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 28 | +22 | +4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 15 | +68 | +12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 22 | +13 | +1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 40 | +17 | +2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 59 | 30 | +29 | +3.5 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 42 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 29 (F) | +28 | +27.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Hireology | JobDiva | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 1 | 2 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Hireology has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Hireology sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for Hireology, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Hireology last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next